Mohamed Al Fayed’s son says allegations that his father raped five of his young women staff is a BBC plot to distract from Huw – as he calls claims ‘outrageous’
By Charlotte Griffiths for The Mail on Sunday
Published: | Updated:
One of Mohamed Al Fayed’s sons has made a spirited defence of his father, dismissing the allegations that he raped five of his young women staff as ‘completely outrageous’.
Omar Al Fayed, 36, has told friends he believes the BBC screened its explosive documentary – Al Fayed: Predator at Harrods – to divert attention from the child porn disgrace of its TV news presenter Huw Edwards.
Environmentalist and publisher Omar told a friend: ‘I think the Beeb have had this up their back pocket.’
He added: ‘With all the fire they are coming under, I think it’s timely that they deployed it just as Huw Edwards is let off the hook effectively for the most disgusting conduct.’
On Monday, Edwards, 63, was given a six-month prison sentence, suspended for two years, after he admitted making indecent images of children.
Mohamed Al Fayed’s son Omar has defended his father against rape allegations, saying they are a plot by the BBC to divert attention from the scandal surrounding Huw Edwards
Mohamed Al Fayed next to his son Omar (centre) and wife Camilla (right).
One of Al Fayed’s victims in the Nineties said it was ‘disgusting and absurd’ for Omar to compare his father with Edwards (pictured)
Another of Al Fayed’s four children with his second wife admitted he was an ‘old-school chauvinist’
But a woman sexually assaulted by Mohamed Al Fayed in the Nineties said it was ‘disgusting and absurd’ for Omar to draw a comparison between his father and Edwards.
‘Fayed’s appalling abuse was on a vast scale and the BBC deserves enormous praise for exposing it,’ she said.
Omar, the youngest of Fayed’s four children with his second wife, Finnish model Heini Wathen, conceded that his father was an ‘old-school chauvinist’.
He told friends: ‘Perhaps he was like an older version of Donald Trump.’
But he added that ‘the allegations of rape are completely outrageous’.
Another close family member told a friend: ‘The family’s been attacked for decades by the Press. Some love them, some hate them.
‘They could never get to him [Mohamed] when he was alive.
‘Assailing the defenceless dead shows more about the attacker’s character than the character they aim to tarnish.’